If you're not from Los Angeles then you might not understand the importance of having an automobile. Londoners, be happy that you have the Tube, even if they shut down for maintenance EVERY weekend. Even if it's sometimes delayed due to "signal failure" or "a person under the train." These are only small obstacles, for you can and will eventually reach your destination, and most likely within the hour (if point A to point B are not on opposite sides of Zone 6 or something...)
45 minutes is a long journey in London. 45 minutes in Los Angeles is "not too far." In fact, that might even be CLOSE, especially if you're coming from the San Fernando Valley and going "over the hill," (as we call the hill that separates the Valley from LA proper).
Let's take a look at the travel distances for a moment, shall we:
*A journey from, let's say Lewisham (hello, July), which is quite South, to Camden Town, which is probably the furthest north you'll be going out to on weekends, is about 9 mi. and driving will take 31 minutes according to Google Maps.
*On public transport, the trip is about 37 minutes. Long journey, Londoner.
A similar journey in Los Angeles goes like this:
*from my home in Encino to my university is about 12 miles, and for Los Angeles Google Maps always has two travel times posted:
one for normal conditions (in this case, 16 minutes) and one for IN TRAFFIC CONDITIONS (41 minutes). Yeah, it takes DOUBLE the time, if not more, to get places in crazy Los Angeles traffic. And it seems as though traffic is not bad only during rush hour, but is getting worse round the clock.
And on public transport? Almost an hour. 16 minutes VS. an hour. That's just ridiculous. See why you need a car?
How is it that Greater London has almost 700 square miles, and Los Angeles has only almost 500 square miles, and it still feels WELL more spread out?
Here's the London tube map (click on images to see them larger):
And here's the LA subway map:
I mean, that's just sad...it's like a malnourished flower, wilting from the Sun's neglect...
Of course the subway map of Los Angeles covers almost 40 miles top to bottom, and the London, only about 6. Regardless, the subway system is seriously lacking. A lot of people don't even know LA has a subway...
Because of this traveling situation, one finds it extremely difficult to have a night out in LA without a vehicle or getting a ride from someone. And, of course, you're going to have to drive back, so either you can't drink or you be stupid and drink and drive. Quite a number of people drink and drive in LA because you want to go out and have a good time but you also ALWAYS have to drive. See in London, people drive mostly on roads. Well, in Los Angeles it's FREEWAYS. 6 lane HUGE DEATH TRAPS 70 miles per hour, or more if they're really crazy. Freeways are not toys, my friends.
In LA, if I couldn't find a ride to a friend's gig or something across town, I couldn't go. End of story. In London, sometimes a gig or party, etc. might be a BIT of a distance (45 minutes on the tube), but I can get there.
It's not all doom and gloom, though. There's no greater feeling than cruising down the Pacific Coast Highway, with the ocean by your side, blasting The Doors' "LA Woman." Sometimes driving a car in LA can feel free and GREAT.
Because I didn't have a vehicle I mainly stayed in Westwood, by UCLA. This was great because most of my friends lived in the neighborhood as well. But university lasts only so long, and soon we'll have to go into the real world. And get cars.
And because everyone is in cars, it makes LA a unique city, but also sometimes quite lonely...
So, my third topic will discuss the ways that the two cities feel different...
3. Big City Feel of London vs. A Big City, but sort of lonely and isolated...
I'm not making LA look too great, am i! I guess these are just reasons I needed to get out for a while!
